Steinberg upgrade cubase 1111/20/2023 It was, as pointed out above, the hardware dongle that I now do recall having (thing that looks like the back of a monitor input adapter. And of course the reason for my lack of USB recollection was because there was no usb licenser back then. What I had all those years ago was Cubase ‘VST’ 5.1 (which my registration shows no evidence of!). and upon checking my original invoice (from Thomann) in 2000 it made sense ? However my registration card that I still have, has on it Cubase 5.1. My intention to upgrade was because I had Cubase 5.1. Well, this has been a saga sadly of my own making!Ĭorrect, many things were unclear, particularly in my little befuddled mind! My not remembering anything about USB licenses was right and wrong. Is there anyone on here from Steinberg who can do something about this ? or do I end up trying to get my money back and stick with my current daw? It looks a fantastic program but one that Steinberg seems not to want me to use !! Strikes me that it should take all of 5 minutes to send me a code that actually works!? It looks like nothing has changed in the last dozen or so years in terms of support. Effectively I’m a new customer and this is how they are dealing with it. Of course same result Made a support ticket over a week ago. Was sent the same activation code 5 times. Gone through the forums and the volumes of activation paraphernalia. Upon activation it simply says no licence is there. I bought the USB and received the email codes download access and licence activation. I can now and have used the upgrade to Cubase 11 which looks majorly back a very good recording program. I went to other DAWS Ptools Reaper Studio 1 and then couldn’t afford Cubase my first love. The program itself I always loved (maybe when it’s your first and only one the comfort zone will always be there). I stopped because the support amongst other things became unworkable with. We really need more competition cause that grass is lookin green af and it’s legal now.I first used Cubase back in the Atari days ! The last version I used was Cub 5. 5 ( ) feeling release, I’m gonna sit right here as the new bugs get worked out while reading everyone’s posts about what they broke because honestly, THAT has been the only consistent thing, every update seems to mess something else up. The last release has gotten better for me in terms of performance but to say why, between windows updates, and other updates, who knows?īut if 13 is another. Our interface literally has drop down arrows that don’t do anything and they’ve been there FOR YEARS! They don’t fix things… clicking an arrow that does nothing… unfixed for years.smdh. The interface is trash imo compared to the competitors and other gui you see with clean looking mixers, snappy lagless knobs. It’s sluggish in windows because of the whole old GUI thing that’s been spoken about for what feels like decades. It almost feels like they bought it for some the tech cause honestly Yamaha has left me unimpressed with anything they’ve brought to the table… and i’m a big Yamaha fan ngl, I still have my AW4416 and a few other doodads but so far, Not one release that made you say hell yea, this is worth my scraped up dollars. In the future? They bought the darn thing 20 years ago!! Probably wanting it, two/three versions ago…! Maybe a drop in the ocean - but I’d say, they most likely add to an ocean of many hundreds/thousands of similarly minded Cubase folk out there, all needing the exact feature. Maybe they were just ‘lucky’ ones that happened to coincide with Steinberg’s choices, decided via other methods.Įither way, it has to help inform… (my theory that I comfort myself with).īesides, you have to imagine those 92 votes posted here don’t exist in their own little bubble. And that’s what makes it interesting for me - to see how far the feature votes figure in the overall scheme… I’m 25+ years a Steinberg user, and I well know its never just been about what’s posted on the forums…! What I have learned though, is there’s been plenty of past successes - directly from user requests posted here, that have been adopted (eventually.!). These requests would need to have thousands or at least hundreds of upvotes to be really in the ‘top 5’ of Steinberg’s priority list.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |